{"id":160771,"date":"2021-01-05T16:00:29","date_gmt":"2021-01-05T16:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/3m-series-963-08e066000\/"},"modified":"2021-01-05T16:00:29","modified_gmt":"2021-01-05T16:00:29","slug":"3m-series-963-08e066000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/3m-series-963-08e066000\/","title":{"rendered":"3M Series 963 &#8211; 08E066000"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Defect Description For Recall<\/h2><p>3M Company (3M) Is Recalling 276 Rolls Of 3M Flexible Prismatic Conspicuity Markings Series 963 RetrorefleCTIve Sheeting Sold For Use As Aftermarket Equipment Which Is Designed To Enhance The Conspicuity Of Certain Trucks And Trailers.  The Sheeting In Question Does Not Comply With One Of The Photometric Performance Requirements Of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, &#8220;Lamps, RefleCTIve Devices, And Associated Equipment.&#8221;  The 3M Part Numbers Are:  963-10 (White), 963-326 (Red\/White), And 963-32 (Red\/White).  The Items Were Produced From The Week Of August 25 Through November 6, 2008.  The Lot Numbers Are Edb 1926, 1927, 1928, And 1934.<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Make Of Vehicle<\/h2><p>3M<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Model Of Vehicle<\/h2><p>SERIES 963<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Year<\/h2><p>9999<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Recall Campaign Number<\/h2><p>08E066000<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Component Description<\/h2><p>Equipment<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Effect Of Defect<\/h2><p>The Sheeting Does Not Reflect The Full Amount Of Light Required By The Standard.  This Could Reduce The Conspicuity Of Vehicles On Which The Sheeting Is Applied, Which Could Increase The Likelihood Of A Crash.<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Fix Defect<\/h2><p>3M Will Notify Owners And Will Offer To Replace The Noncompliant Sheeting With Equivalent Or Better Sheeting, At No Charge.  The Recall Began During November 2008.  Owners Can Contact 3M At 1-651-736-3132.<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Vehicle Manufacturer<\/h2><p>3M Company Traffic Safety Systems Div.<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Start Of Manufacture<\/h2><p><\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">End Of Manufacture<\/h2><p><\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Type Of Vehicle Recall<\/h2><p>E<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Number Affected<\/h2><p>276<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Date Owners Notified<\/h2><p>20081125<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Initiated By<\/h2><p>Mfr<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Responsible Manufacturer<\/h2><p>3M Company Traffic Safety Systems Div.<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Date Report Received<\/h2><p>20081119<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Make Campaign Number<\/h2><p><\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Part Number<\/h2><p>571<\/p><h2 class=\"has-Medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard<\/h2><p>108<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vehicle recall defect &#8211; 3M Company (3M) Is Recalling 276 Rolls Of 3M Flexible Prismatic Conspicuity Markings Series 963 RetrorefleCTIve Sheeting Sold For Use As Aftermarket Equipment Which Is Designed To Enhance The Conspicuity Of Certain Trucks And Trailers.  The Sheeting In Question Does Not Comply With One Of The Photometric Performance Requirements Of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, &#8220;Lamps, RefleCTIve Devices, And Associated Equipment.&#8221;  The 3M Part Numbers Are:  963-10 (White), 963-326 (Red\/White), And 963-32 (Red\/White).  The Items Were Produced From The Week Of August 25 Through November 6, 2008.  The Lot Numbers Are Edb 1926, 1927, 1928, And 1934.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[18633,18632],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160771"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vehicle-recall.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}