Vehicle recall defect – Certain Minivans Have An Interference Condition Between The Lower Ball Joint Rubber Boot And The Steering Knuckle (Both Left/Right Sides), Which Could Result In Cutting Of The Boot That Is Intended To Seal The Ball Joint. If The Lower Ball Joint Boot Were Cut, Contamination From The Road (Salt, Dirt, Water, Etc.) Could Enter The Ball Socket Area Of The Ball Joint Causing The Joint To Wear Out Too Quickly.
Vehicle recall defect – Certain Replacement Fuel Filters, Fram Brand Name P/N G3727, With Date Codes X52911 Through X60801 Sequentially Or X600141 And A Mexico Country Or Origin Marking On The Fuel Filter Housing Manufactured From October 18, 2005, Through March 21, 2006, Sold For Use On The Vehicles Listed Above And On Certain School Buses. (To See The School Bus Engine Sizes, Click On “Document Search” And Then “Bus Applications”). The Connector On The Fuel Filter Was Not Manufactured To Honeywell’S Specification. As A Result, The O-Ring May Not Seat Correctly On The Fuel Line.
Vehicle recall defect – Certain Pro-A Motors Corner Lamps, Turn Signals, And Headlights Sold As Replacement Lamps For Use On Certain Passenger Vehicles Listed Above. Some Combination Lamps That Are Not Equipped With Amber Side Reflectors Fail To Conform To Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108, Lamps, RefleCTIve Devices, And Associated Equipment.
Vehicle recall defect – With The Driver Seat In The Forward Most Position, The Safety Belt Is Excessively Tight For Persons Whose Dimensions Are Those Of A 95Th Percentile Male, Resulting In Non-Compliance With Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Conversion Vans. The Inboard Buckles For The Driver’S And Front Passenger Seats Were Installed On A Seat Bar Attached To The Seat Pedestal. This Raised The Buckle Location Closer Than Permitted By The Requirements Of Fmvss No. 208, “Occupant Crash ProteCTIon.”