Vehicle recall defect – The Studs Which Attach The Brake Master Cylinder To The Power Brake VacuUM Booster Assembly Can Develop Stress Corrosion Cracking After Being Operated For An Extended Period Of Time In The Southern California Location.
Vehicle recall defect – Vehicle Description: Multi-Purpose Passenger Vehicles. This Is Not A Safety Recall In Accordance With Federal Regulation 573. However, It Is Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign By The Agency. The Campaign Will Reinforce The Bracket Attachments Of The Rear Liftgate Gas Assist Cylinders Which Could Pull Away From The Inside Of The Liftgate.
Vehicle recall defect – The Rigid Mounted Safety Belt Buckles Are DefeCTIve In Three Ways. First, A Fastened Safety Belt Buckle Will Not Unlatch When The Release Button Is Depressed. This Results From Interference Between The Buckle Ejector Finger And The Buckle Tongue Window. The Second Defect Is The Safety Belt Buckle May Not Latch. The Third Possible Defect Is That The Tongue May Be Retained By The Buckle, But It May Not Be Latched Sufficiently To Provide Occupant ProteCTIon.
Vehicle recall defect – When The Automatic Transmission Shift Lever Is Placed In The Park Position, The Park Pawl Does Not Always Abut Or Engage The Park Gear.
Vehicle recall defect – Rear Bumper Reinforcement May Be Subject To Fatigue Cracking Under Extended Trailer Tow Service When Using A Bumper-Mounted Trailer Hitch Ball.
Vehicle recall defect – The Hot Plate Weld Which Attaches The Vapor Vent Valve Carrier To The Top Of The Plastic Fuel Tank May Partially Fracture, Allowing Vapor Of Fuel To Escape From The Top Of The Tank.
Vehicle recall defect – The Front Heat Shield May Contact The Front Of The Plastic Fuel Tank, Causing Cuts Or Other Damage To The Extent Of Penetration.
Vehicle recall defect – If Sunroof Glass Is Removed And Reinstalled By Vehicle Operator, Hinge Assemblies Can Be Accidentally Improperly Mated.
Vehicle recall defect – This Is Not A Safety Recall In Accordance With The Safety Act. However, It Is Deemed A Safety Improvement Campaign By The Agency. Equipment Description: Ford Is Replacing All Firestone Wilderness At 15, 16, And 17 Inch Tires Mounted On Ford Trucks And Suvs. Ford Reports Tread Separation Can Occur Due To A Combination Of The Sensitivity Of The Tire Design To Stress, Aging, And Manufacturing Differences Between Plants. Ford Is Replacing These Tires To Prevent Possible Premature Tire Failure. Vehicle Description: The Vehicles Listed Below May Have Been Originally Equipped With Firestone Wilderness At Tires Or May Have Had Wilderness At Tires Installed During The Firestone Recall Launched In August 2000. Certain 1991 Throught 2002 Ford Explorer Certain 2001 Throught 2002 Explorer Sport, And Sport Trac Certain 1997 Through 2002 Mercury Mountaineer Certain 1991 Through 2001 Ranger Certain 1999 Through 2001 Expedition Certain 1991 Through 1994, And 1997 Model Year F-Series Certain 1991 Through 1994 Bronco Note: Both Original Equipment And Replacement Tires Are Affected.
Vehicle recall defect – Tire Description: Firestone Wilderness At, Size P235/75R15, Produced At The Decatur, Illinois Tire Plant And All Firestone Radial ATX And Radial ATX Ii Tires, Size P235/75R15. Operation Of These Tires At Low Inflation Pressures, High Speed, And In Hot Weather, Can Contribute To Separation Of The Tire Tread.